The Hunger Games – impressions



 To say that the Hunger Games lives up to its hype is understating the case just a tad.

It’s one of the best book to film transitions I’ve ever seen, and it fleshes out a lot of the contrast between the Haves of the capitol and the Have Nots of District 12, while not really sacrificing any of the spirit or the feel of the books.

One of the most brilliant pieces of work in the film is the way director Gary Ross portrays District 12, especially in the flashbacks. I could swear in two or three shots, he’s re staged photos from dirty 30’s. I’m sure I’ve seen at least two of the photos he based the shots on, especially the one of the miners in the cage just before they go down to the coal face. The actors mange to get that bleak, hopeless look in their eyes and stance and capture perfectly the depression and hopelessness of their circumstances.

In addition, both he and Suzanne get it right – my grandfather was a coal miner in England during the dirty 30s, and if he wasn’t being beaten because of the union battles, he was earning a pair of black lungs for almost no money. My mother told me stories about eating bacon grease sandwiches when the rest of the food ran out and about Grandaddy poaching to put food on the table. He used a gun instead of bows and arrows, but the poverty was the same, as was the need. Even the dresses, hair and clothing of District 12 in the crowd scenes, and the older men’s clothing are eerily reminiscent of everyday clothing of the 1930s.

The capital brings to mind both the grandeur and dominance of Imperial Rome, and of the Nazi Reich in Germany during the 30s. The decadence of Berlin during those years is hinted at by the clothing and outré hairstyles and colouring of the populace, and the clothing styles in the crowd shots strongly suggest the clothing of the fashionable during the 30s and 40s.

Beyond that, the story remains largely faithful to the book and highlights the grinding down of the will and the spirits of those in the districts, and contrast it to the party atmosphere of the city during Games week. The violence through the film is moderated by the camera becoming a viewpoint instead of an observer, with tricky focus and shaking, but I still found myself staring at the seat in front of me or my hands during some of the fight scenes.

Moving? Definitely. I was choked up all through the reaping scene, and even though I knew Katniss had to survive and win the games, still perched on the edge of my seat for that segment of the film. Rue’s death was less emotional than I expected. As cute and vulnerable and as plucky as she was, it still didn’t engage me as it should have, and I’m not sure why. Perhaps because it was inevitable Rue die simply because of her resemblance to Prim and the necessity for her death to foreshadow Prim’s in  the later books. I was far more moved by Cato’s death at the end of the games, when he offers himself to Katniss’s bow and realizes what a waste his life has been, and how little pride matters.

The images and the scenes in this film are going to haunt me, simply because, in reminding us of the outrages and horrors of the Reich, they also suggest that we may have already surpassed the Nazis in cruelty and soullessness – if a film portraying children killing children can garner this much enthusiastic praise with almost no voices raised in protest, what does that say about us as a culture?


2 comments on “The Hunger Games – impressions

  1. Lori says:

    I would venture to say that the enthusiasm comes from a generation who feels powerless. They are insignificant in their own lives every day, being shuffled from one arranged activity to another.

    This book is a spark of light…the idea that one girl could change the landscape of an evil culture.

    I believe you’ve missed the entire message.

    • bevcooke says:

      No, I got the message of the books, Lori – read all three of them twice and saw the movie three times. What I was remarking on was how few voices actually objected to showing children killing children on screen. For me, while the books made it necessary, the trilogy carried the entire revolution thread through, whereas the film didn’t. Except for the one scene where Rue’s district rioted, there was no indication in the film that Katniss would lead anything but a frustrated, purposeless life that required her to continue to participate in the outrage. If you hadn’t read the books before seeing the movie, you came away with a completely different experience than someone familiar with the entire story line. Yet even so, nobody seemed to think actually portraying 18 year olds killing 12 year olds was anything but entertainment – the reaction of people having seen the film, for me, made the point of the books. We’re there. And even with all the horror, the elementary school shootings in December 2012 just underlined it for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s